Skip to main content
Ecolint Campus des NationsMathematics
Ecolint Campus des NationsMathematics
Year 10 · Statistics

Solutions · Full Answer Key

Pack A answers · Pack B answers · Problem-solving worked solutions

Pack A — Answers

Bronze
1.7
2.7
3.5
4.3
5.10
6.18
7.mode = 5; range = 4
8.(a) IQR = 12 (b) median = 18
9.7
10.x=5x = 5
Silver
11.3.8
12.13th value
13.Q1=4.5Q_1 = 4.5, Q3=13Q_3 = 13
14.14
15.min=4, Q1Q_1=7, med=12, Q3Q_3=17, max=20
16.Boxplot B (smaller IQR)
17.2.9
18.3
19.x=9x = 9
20.Skewed (positively/right-skewed)
Gold
21.Q1=12Q_1 = 12, median = 18, Q3=23Q_3 = 23
22.18
23.18
24.Yes — 75 > 70 (upper fence)
25.Same median; A more consistent (smaller IQR)
26.20
27.Third class (covers cf 22 to 45; median position 30 lies here)
28.x=3x = 3
29.25%
30.435
Platinum
31.64.5
32.x=21x = 21
33.≈70\approx 70 (cf = 120 is 60th percentile for 200)
34.B has higher median and more concentrated middle (smaller IQR: 10 vs 13)
35.70 is an outlier
36.72.5
37.[10,20)[10, 20); frequency density (freq/width) gives true comparison
38.B
39.66.0
40.{1,3,5,7,7}\{1, 3, 5, 7, 7\} (or similar)

Pack B — Answers

Bronze
1.8
2.10
3.10
4.7
5.17
6.12
7.mode = 7; range = 7
8.(a) IQR = 12 (b) median = 15
9.12 (smallest)
10.x=7x = 7
Silver
11.2.8
12.mean of 25th and 26th values
13.Q1=6.5Q_1 = 6.5, Q3=16Q_3 = 16
14.19
15.min=2, Q1Q_1=4.5, med=9, Q3Q_3=13.5, max=18
16.Boxplot B
17.1.6
18.30
19.x=14x = 14
20.Positively (right) skewed
Gold
21.Q1=5Q_1 = 5, median = 11, Q3=17Q_3 = 17
22.23
23.7.75
24.No — 5 > −20-20 (lower fence)
25.Same median; B more consistent
26.30
27.Third class (cf 25 to 50; median at 40)
28.x=3x = 3
29.25%
30.900
Platinum
31.60
32.x=19x = 19
33.≈60\approx 60
34.B has higher median; both have IQR 10
35.50 and 60 are outliers
36.65.6
37.[5,10)[5, 10); with unequal widths use density
38.B
39.69.0
40.{1,1,3,4,11}\{1, 1, 3, 4, 11\} (or similar)

Problem-solving — Worked Solutions

1Problem 1
Answer
(a) mean 13.75, median 13.5, mode 16, range 8 (b) mean 14.75, median 15, mode 16, range 9 (c) See working
Full working
(a) Sort: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 16, 18.
- **Mean** = (11+14+16+13+18+12+16+10)/8=110/8=13.75(11+14+16+13+18+12+16+10)/8 = 110/8 = 13.75.
- **Median**: 8 values → mean of 4th and 5th = (13+14)/2=13.5(13+14)/2 = 13.5.
- **Mode** = 16 (appears twice).
- **Range** = 18−10=818 - 10 = 8.

(b) Replace 11 with 19. New data sorted: 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 16, 18, 19.
- New sum = 110−11+19=118110 - 11 + 19 = 118. Mean = 118/8=14.75118/8 = 14.75.
- Median = mean of 4th and 5th = (14+16)/2=15(14 + 16)/2 = 15.
- Mode still 16.
- Range = 19−10=919 - 10 = 9.

(c) The **median** changed by 1.5 (from 13.5 to 15) while the mean changed by 1.0. Here, removing a low value (11) and adding a high value (19) shifted the central order so much that the median moved noticeably. In general, the mean is sensitive to changes in *any* value, while the median only changes when the central values shift.
2Problem 2
Answer
(a) ~25 (b) Q1≈18Q_1 \approx 18, Q3≈33Q_3 \approx 33, IQR ~ 15 (c) ~22%
Full working
For n=80n = 80: Q1Q_1 at cf 20; median at cf 40; Q3Q_3 at cf 60.

(a) Reading off: median at cf 40 → between ≤20\leq 20 (cf 28) and ≤30\leq 30 (cf 52). Linear interpolation: 20+(40−28)/(52−28)×10=20+5=2520 + (40-28)/(52-28) \times 10 = 20 + 5 = 25. **Median ≈ 25**.

(b) Q1Q_1 at cf 20: between cf 8 (mark 10) and 28 (mark 20). 10+(20−8)/(28−8)×10=10+6=1610 + (20-8)/(28-8) \times 10 = 10 + 6 = 16. Q1≈16Q_1 \approx 16.
Q3Q_3 at cf 60: between cf 52 (mark 30) and 72 (mark 40). 30+(60−52)/(72−52)×10=30+4=3430 + (60-52)/(72-52) \times 10 = 30 + 4 = 34. Q3≈34Q_3 \approx 34.
**IQR ≈ 34 − 16 = 18**.

(c) cf at mark 35: between cf 52 (mark 30) and 72 (mark 40). Linear: 52+(35−30)/10×(72−52)=52+10=6252 + (35-30)/10 \times (72-52) = 52 + 10 = 62. So 62 students scored ≤ 35, meaning 80−62=1880 - 62 = 18 students scored more than 35. Percentage: 18/80×100=22.5%18/80 \times 100 = \mathbf{22.5\%}.
3Problem 3
Answer
Team A: more consistent (lower IQR, higher median). Team B: more unpredictable but higher max
Full working
**Comparison.**
- Median: A = 2 > B = 1 → Team A typically scores more per match.
- IQR: A = 3−1=23 - 1 = 2; B = 4−0=44 - 0 = 4. Team A is more consistent.
- Range: A = 5; B = 8. Team B more variable.

**Backing decision.** Depends on goal:
- Want a high-probability return → **Team A** (median 2 vs 1; more likely to score consistently around the median).
- Want a chance of a big score → **Team B** (max 8, longer upper whisker).

For a single match prediction, statistician would back **Team A** (higher median, more consistent middle 50% above zero — Team B has Q1=0Q_1 = 0, meaning 25% of B's matches end in 0 goals).
4Problem 4
Answer
79
Full working
Mean × count = sum: 68×10=68068 \times 10 = 680.

Sum of given 9 scores: 45+67+52+78+84+56+73+65+8145 + 67 + 52 + 78 + 84 + 56 + 73 + 65 + 81.
=45+67=112= 45 + 67 = 112; +52=164+52 = 164; +78=242+78 = 242; +84=326+84 = 326; +56=382+56 = 382; +73=455+73 = 455; +65=520+65 = 520; +81=601+81 = 601.

10th score = 680−601=79680 - 601 = \mathbf{79}.
5Problem 5
Answer
(a) ≈ 11.67 min (b) [10, 15) (c) [10, 15)
Full working
Total frequency: 8+14+22+12+4=608 + 14 + 22 + 12 + 4 = 60.

(a) Use midpoints: 2.5, 7.5, 12.5, 17.5, 22.5.
Sum: 2.5(8)+7.5(14)+12.5(22)+17.5(12)+22.5(4)2.5(8) + 7.5(14) + 12.5(22) + 17.5(12) + 22.5(4)
=20+105+275+210+90=700= 20 + 105 + 275 + 210 + 90 = 700.
Mean: 700/60≈11.67700/60 \approx \mathbf{11.67} min.

(b) Highest frequency 22 → **modal class is [10, 15)**.

(c) Median position = 30 (between 30th and 31st). Cumulative: 8, 22, 44, 56, 60. 30 lies between 22 and 44 → **median class is [10, 15)**.
6Problem 6
Answer
(a) Both 70 (b) A: 0; B: 40 (c) B much more variable
Full working
(a) Set A: all 70, mean = 70. Set B: (50+60+70+80+90)/5=350/5=70(50+60+70+80+90)/5 = 350/5 = 70. Both means are 70.

(b) Set A range: 70−70=070 - 70 = 0. Set B range: 90−50=4090 - 50 = 40.

(c) Set B has much higher variability (spread). The same mean does **not** mean the same shape — Set A has zero spread (all identical), Set B varies from 50 to 90. On a dot plot Set A is one cluster at 70; Set B is spread out.
7Problem 7
Answer
(a) 11 (b) Positively skewed (c) Yes — values above 41.5 are outliers
Full working
(a) IQR = Q3−Q1=25−14=11Q_3 - Q_1 = 25 - 14 = 11.

(b) Whisker lengths: lower = 14−10=414 - 10 = 4; upper = 50−25=2550 - 25 = 25. Upper >> lower → **positive (right) skew**. Also: median (18) closer to Q1Q_1 (14) than to Q3Q_3 (25), confirming right skew.

(c) Fences: lower = 14−1.5(11)=14−16.5=−2.514 - 1.5(11) = 14 - 16.5 = -2.5; upper = 25+16.5=41.525 + 16.5 = 41.5. Max = 50 > 41.5 → **outlier at the high end**. The exact value isn't shown by the boxplot, but the maximum 50 lies in outlier territory.
8Problem 8
Answer
(a) 71.2 (b) No — weighted average (c) Equal sizes (24 each)
Full working
(a) Sum A: 24×68=163224 \times 68 = 1632. Sum B: 16×76=121616 \times 76 = 1216. Combined sum: 2848. Combined mean: 2848/40=71.22848/40 = \mathbf{71.2}.

(b) Simple average (68+76)/2=72(68+76)/2 = 72. The combined mean (71.2) is **not** the simple average — it is closer to 68 because Class A has more students. The combined mean is a **weighted average**, where each class is weighted by its size.

(c) For combined mean = 72 (the simple average of 68 and 76), the two classes would need to have **equal weights** = equal sizes. So 24 in each, for example. (Or any other equal-size pair.)
9Problem 9
Answer
(a) Mean = £346k; median = £245k (b) Median fairer (c) £1.3M flat skews the mean upward
Full working
(a) Sum: 180+200+220+230+240+250+270+280+290+1300=3460180+200+220+230+240+250+270+280+290+1300 = 3460 (thousand). Mean = 3460/10=3463460/10 = 346 (thousand) = **£346,000** — consistent with the advertised £350k (rounded).
Median: 10 values → mean of 5th and 6th sorted = (240+250)/2=245(240 + 250)/2 = 245 (thousand) = **£245,000**.

(b) The **median is fairer** for "typical": 9 out of 10 flats are below £300k. The mean is pulled upward by the single £1.3M outlier.

(c) The outlier (£1.3M flat) drags the mean from ~£240k upwards to £346k — a 44% inflation. The median is immune. The agent has chosen the statistic that suits their advertising.
10Problem 10
Answer
(a) e.g. {7,7,9,11,16}\{7, 7, 9, 11, 16\} (b) Multiple — list in working
Full working
Constraints: mean 10 → sum 50. Median 9 → 3rd value (sorted) = 9. Mode 7 → 7 appears more than any other value. With 5 distinct positive ints — wait, **distinct** contradicts mode 7 (which requires repetition).

**Re-read the problem:** "5 distinct positive integers" is incompatible with a mode. So we interpret the question as "5 positive integers (not necessarily distinct) with mode 7" — i.e. 7 must appear at least twice (so it's the unique mode).

Sort: a,b,9,d,ea, b, 9, d, e with sum 50, a+b+d+e=41a + b + d + e = 41. Mode 7 means 7 must appear ≥ 2 times.

Case 1: a=b=7a = b = 7. Then d+e=41−14=27d + e = 41 - 14 = 27, with d≥9d \geq 9, e≥de \geq d, and no other value repeated. Options: d=9d = 9 (but then 9 appears twice — equals mode 7's count of 2: not unique mode unless we exclude this). d=10,e=17d = 10, e = 17; d=11,e=16d = 11, e = 16; d=12,e=15d = 12, e = 15; d=13,e=14d = 13, e = 14. So sets: {7,7,9,10,17},{7,7,9,11,16},{7,7,9,12,15},{7,7,9,13,14}\{7,7,9,10,17\}, \{7,7,9,11,16\}, \{7,7,9,12,15\}, \{7,7,9,13,14\}.

Case 2: One of {a,b}\{a, b\} = 7, and one of {d,e}\{d, e\} = 7? No — d≥9d \geq 9, so 7 can't appear above the median.

**Possible sets**: at least 4, as listed above.
11Problem 11
Answer
(a) mean 65, IQR 12 (b) mean 120, IQR 24 (c) mean 130, IQR 24
Full working
(a) Adding a constant to all values shifts the mean by the same amount but doesn't change the spread:
- New mean = 60+5=6560 + 5 = 65.
- IQR unchanged = 12.

(b) Multiplying all values by 2 scales both the centre and spread by 2:
- New mean = 60×2=12060 \times 2 = 120.
- New IQR = 12×2=2412 \times 2 = 24.

(c) Add 5, then double. New value = 2(x+5)=2x+102(x + 5) = 2x + 10.
- New mean = 2(60)+10=1302(60) + 10 = 130.
- New IQR: only the 2x2x contributes to spread (the +10 is constant). New IQR = 2×12=242 \times 12 = 24.
12Problem 12
Answer
(a) Sampling variability (b) Robust to high earners (c) Larger sample / stratified sampling
Full working
(a) **Sampling variability** — any random sample is just one possible draw from the population. The sample mean fluctuates around the true mean. With n=50n = 50 the estimate may be off by several percent of the true value.

(b) **Income distributions are typically right-skewed** (a few very high earners). The mean is pulled upward by these high values, giving a misleadingly high "typical" income. The median is robust to outliers and better reflects the typical household.

(c) **Improvements:**
- Increase sample size (smaller sampling error).
- **Stratified sampling** by neighbourhood, age, or housing type, so each sub-group is represented proportionally.
- Combine mean and median — report both, along with IQR or range, for a fuller picture.